Free Trial
Forgot your password?

Questions? Call us at 800-207-8001

  • HOME
  • WHITE HOUSE
  • POLITICS
  • CONGRESS
  • DOMESTIC POLICY
  • NATIONAL SECURITY
  • TECH
  • COLUMNS
    • Political Connections by Ronald Brownstein
    • The Cook Report by Charlie Cook
    • Off to the Races by Charlie Cook
    • Vantage Point
    • Common Sense by Matthew Dowd
    • On The Trail by Reid Wilson
    • Against the Grain by Josh Kraushaar
    • Rules of the Game by Eliza Newlin Carney
    • Gwen's Take by Gwen Ifill
    •  
  • BLOGS
    • On Call
    • Tech Daily Dose
    • Voices
    • Expert Blogs
  • POLLS
    • Politics
    • Congress
    • Energy
    • National Security
  • EVENTS

Hey Obama and Perry: Are You Men Enough for My Town?

By Kathy Kiely
October 10, 2011 | 10:45 PM |
Share Share

President Obama and Rick Perry are both headed to Pittsburgh this week -- not, I suspect, to sample a Primanti's sammich, as we homies like to call the gustatory tests of manhood that combine, meat, cheese, coleslaw AND french fries between two hearty slabs of Italian bread.

A tougher test of manhood awaits Obama and the Texas governor who wants to oust him from the White House when they talk about jobs in a city that has lost so many of them. Tuesday, Obama touts his jobs bill at a union training center. On Friday, it will be Perry's turn to unveil his jobs plan. Both have them have picked the right venue -- if they are willing to grapple with the hard truths that Pittsburgh represents. But those can be harder to swallow than a kolbassi with provolone from Primanti Brothers.

The side of Pittsburgh that most visitors see -- the one the Chamber of Commerce understandably prefers to highlight -- is the one you glimpsed Sunday if you caught my Steelers play on TV. The overhead shot from was breathtaking: Against a crystalline blue fall sky (the sort seldom seen when I was a kid and the mills were running three shifts), the downtown sparkled, a collection of handsome skyscrapers nestled closely together at the famous confluence of the three rivers.

But the "Golden Triangle" is a Potemkin village. To see what lies behind the facade, the blimp or the politicians only need to go just a few miles upriver along the Monongehela There they'd find a sea of boarded up homes and businesses, the detrius of the steel industry that collapsed into near-nothingness beginning in the 1970s.

Pittsburgh is one city with two compelling tales. The most often-told is about the Renaissance City, which shook off its sooty past and remade itself into a sparkling yuppie paradise with high-end shopping malls and waterfront bike trails where steel mills used to be and medical researchers and university professors taking the place of the blue-collar workers who gave the football team its name.

The other, sadder story is about places like Wilkinsburg, a once vibrant middle-class borough that I drive through almost every day when I'm visiting my dad. Vacant buildings have become crack houses and once-bustling streets have become shooting galleries where ambition long ago was swallowed up by despair.

It's this story that makes Pittsburgh the perfect place for the president or his rivals to talk about jobs. Pittsburgh encapsulates the challenges facing post-industrial America, a place where some people are doing better than ever but many others feel they are on the edge of a precipice, if they have not already been swallowed up by the chasm.

But they are challenges our leaders have been avoiding for decades.

Back when I was a cub reporter for The Pittsburgh Press (an afternoon newspaper that, like everything else associated with a lifestyle oriented around the early factory shifts, has disappeared), Republican economists shrugged off steel companies' complaints about foreign competitors undercutting them with cut-rate labor and government subsidies. Who cared, as long as Americans could get cheaper goods, went the thinking. We were going to offshore the dirty work and all be middle managers. Democrats weren't much more sympathetic to the plight of the blue collar workers who had been their loyal constituents. Just before he joined newly-elected president Bill Clinton's Cabinet in 1993, Robert Reich penned a book called Work of Nations that wrote off manufacturing in favor of a brave new working world in which the real money would be made by highly specialized service workers.

It's true that there are people like that in Pittsburgh today making big money: The doctor who used robotic surgery to replace both of my dad's hips, for instance.

But that sort of work only keeps so many households afloat. Which is why Pittsburgh's population is about half of what it was growing up there sucking in particulates from the steel mills. And, I suspect, it's why, when the president shows up in town tomorrow, he'll be touting legislation that will put people to work fixing roads and building bridges -- just the sort of dirty work that economists of both parties once argued was part of the past.

Obama, who started his career as a community organizer in a Chicago neighborhood that had a hole where its steel mill used to be, talked a lot about the need to revive the nation's manufacturing sector on the campaign trail. Easier said than done in a world where corporations can move to where labor is cheap and occupational health and safety standards, never mind environmental protections, are non-existent. Am I the only one who thinks the real Solyndra scandal is not the penny-ante self-dealing of some mid-level administration official, but the Chinese-government subsidies that made the company's solar panels uncompetitive?

This is exactly the same sort of complaint that steelmakers used to make about their competition before the industry disappeared almost completely from the place we Pittsburghers used to call the Steel Valley.

Politicians of both parties don't want to tackle these kinds of problems head on because its not popular to interfere in the "free" market. But unless and until the president and all the Republicans who want his job are willing to do so, they'd be better off putting a Primanti sandwich in their mouths. It tastes better than the empty promises.

Permalink
Join the Discussion

The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

Comments powered by Disqus

 

Advertisement

About Voices

A free and paid website. A weekly magazine. A daily newspaper. A political almanac and Hotline. You would think we already have enough platforms at National Journal, enough ways to communicate with our readers and viewers. But there are never enough ways to talk to you. So we are creating this page to feature the voices of our most prolific staffers. Join the conversation. There'll be more to come.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Archives


Monthly Archives

  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • November 2010
  • October 2010



Latest On Blogs

HEALTHCARE

Can Democrats Turn the Health Debate to Their Advantage?

April 28, 2011

EDUCATION

Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights

July 5, 2011

ECONOMY

Transforming the Highway Trust Fund

February 22, 2011

ENERGY

Extreme Weather and Climate Change: What's the Link?

July 5, 2011

TRANSPORTATION

The Environmental Case for Transportation Investment

July 5, 2011

SECURITY

Will President Obama's Afghanistan Strategy Prove Effective?

June 27, 2011

HOTLINEONCALL

Only 18,000 Jobs Added in June, Less Than One Fifth of Analyst Estimates

July 8, 2011

TECHDAILYDOSE

Rain Still Threatening Shuttle Launch

July 8, 2011

VOICES

John Edwards: The Latest In a Pathetic Parade

May 25, 2011

 

Advertisement

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic
Copyright © 2012 by National Journal Group Inc.